In the very near future, VR-like simulation games are a popular form of entertainment. The protagonist believes he has worked out a way to make them multiplayer. However, this lands him in an awkward situation with the company behind the technology. Now that he has a window into the fantasies of those closest to him, how will he change? How will they change?
Note:
This is not a dating sim, or a romance story. It leans much more toward an erotic sci-fi suspense/thriller.
Installation:
1- Extract and run.
Developer: DigiDec
Censored: No
Version: 0.5
Language: English
Genre: 3DCG, Adventure, Anal Sex, Big Ass, Big Tits, Fantasy, Female Domination, Lesbian, Male Protagonist, Milf, Oral Sex, Sci-fi, Sex Toys, Vaginal Sex
- Support Developer of this game:
- Website
- Patreon
- Itch
- discord
- Subscribestar
- Steam
Download for Windows/ Linux
Download for Windows/ Linux - Compressed
Download for Mac - v0.4.1
Download for Mac - Compressed
Download for Android
- swipe down to hide the ui
- swipe left to roll back
- swipe right to start skipping of text
- swipe 2x left&right to open the game menu
- swipe up&down to toggle a small window with memory usage information
- longpress the save file thumbnail in the save/load screen to delete this slot
Download Mod
Updated for game version: 0.3.2 (The way the mod is coded, even if the current game version is ahead of the mod, the mod will still work & not create problems. You just won’t have any changes to the game content past this version. With the dev saying there won’t be any ‘choose 1 sim only’ choice past version 0.2.1, the mod can be considered complete. I’ll still try to update it to adjust the dialogue, but it shouldn’t be any problem playing with an outdated mod unless the early content gets changed of course)
Features: Play all the sims in one play through naturally. (more info in spoilers)
Installation: Drop the 00_AllSimsMod.rpy file in the /game folder (found where the.exe is present)
Works with existing saves (more info in spoiler)
Doesn’t break saves.
Spoiler
“I cannot find the MOD option”
Like mentioned above, the mod let’s you see all the sims naturally, i.e. there is no MOD/cheat option. Play normally & the mc can choose to peek at other sims after the 1st one. The goal was to make it a part of the game, not feel like you’re breaking the game.
Saves: Installing or removing the mod will not break saves. The mod will affect existing saves, but not if you load right at the choice. The game needs to go to the label for the mod to override it, while loading non-modded saves will load the unmodded labels it was saved during.
To solve this: Rollback after loading a save. As far back as you can. Then play/skip to the choice.
If this doesn’t help, then load an earlier save (try 2-3 scenes back to be sure) & play/skip to the present/choice.
Starting a new game will obviously not have such issues & is therefore recommended
Other features/See all content:
Like mentioned above, it is a story mod for the sim choices, nothing outside of that is touched. This mod was created cause I thought giving such options to the player would make for a better game.
If you want to see all content/routes, there’s a cheat mod available already outdated cheatmod breaks the game.
This mod is if you want to play the game naturally but thought mc watching only one sim was bad design.
Compatibility: It should be compatible with other mods as long as they don’t change the label names or override the labels themselves.
Currently the game only has a cheat mod(outdated cheatmod breaks the game) & this should be compatible with that (not tested) if it’s updated to the current game version.
Ofc when using both mods, this mod will override the labels during sim choices/mentions & thus the other mod will not take effect for that label.
Updates: I’ll try to update after the game updates, but I’ll probably not check on the game very regularly.
Seems the dev went with the ‘see only 1 out of 3’ format for the sims.
Looking at the game’s story, there shouldn’t be a problem even if you see all the sims in one play-through.
Hence the AllSims Mod let’s you, the player, decide whether the mc tries to see more than 1 sim per opportunity.
To the dev:
dev check the indent on line 9298 in script.rpy.
It seems to be locked behind the final else when it should (probably) be outside the if-else structure.
Anonymous
It’s not just a game! Games groom children to kill themselves on behalf of the conspiracy that is paying these creators money upon money! That’s why there are so many creators because they get paid good! Dead people are people who pay more to conspiracy business! Do u think company makes money from people who are live? NO! Only dead pay money! Look at soshal insecurity so many dead money to creators!
Anonymous
I don’t think your English translator did what you hoped.
Anonymous
Study Confirms Gay Life Expectancy Twenty Years Shorter
A new study which analyzed tens of thousands of gay obituaries and compared them with AIDS deaths data from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), has shown that the life expectancy for homosexuals is about twenty years shorter than that of the general public. The study, entitled “Gay obituaries closely track officially reported deaths from AIDS”, has been published in Psychological Reports (2005;96:693-697).
Truth
The life expectancy of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people is a subject of research. Early research by the Cameron group purporting to find a significantly shorter life expectancy among homosexuals is not considered reliable, although it has been widely misused and cited.[1][2][3][4] During the AIDS crisis, a loss in average life expectancy was observed among gay men.[3][2]
In the late 2000s, research suggested “the claims of drastically increased overall mortality in gay men and lesbians appear unjustified”.[5] As of 2020, data from Sweden found no gap in mortality between homosexual and heterosexual individuals, although mortality may be higher in bisexuals.[6] A 2022 study in the United States found no excess mortality among gay and bisexual males, but found excess mortality among bisexual and lesbian females.[7]
transphobic euphoria
By whom? The gay John Corvino? Some journalists from a Sydney or Seattle tabloids? These are the kind of “reliable” sources behind the numbers in your comment. Or maybe someone else who is sponsored by some Soros foundation? In addition, those sources do not actually say that the Cameron group’s research was unreliable as it is presented in that biased wiki-article, but only that it had become outdated by the 21st century because “the life expectancy of gay and bisexual men would be greatly improved. Deaths from HIV infection have declined dramatically in this population since 1996”. What can I say, Long live pharma!
In general, it’s funny that people are used to blindly referring to such an unreliable source of information as Wikipedia. But if the beginning has already been made, then I will join:
“Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men are a small percentage of the U.S. population, but are consistently the population group most affected by the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the United States, and are the largest proportion of American citizens with an AIDS diagnosis who have died. … In 2010 the CDC reported that MSM [men who have sex with men] represented approximately 4 percent of the male population in the United States but male-to-male sex accounted for 78 percent of new HIV infections among men and 63 percent of all new infections.”
In short, pharma is good, but don’t fuck in the ass too much, boy.
transphobic euphoria
A little bit more about what Wikipedia is, especially its political/historical/social-themed articles, using the example of that article about the mortality of faggots (LGBT life expectancy). Entering the article talk page, there is a message from the main (most active) author of the content of the article “explaining” why he/she/it/they deleted a huge piece of text that was based on a number of scientific publications. Enjoy that deleted text:
“Transgender mortality studies
A 2021 study in the Netherlands found that males receiving hormone treatment were experiencing higher mortality rates compared to both men and women in the general population. The elevated mortality did not decrease over time. The increase in mortality was attributed to lung cancer, cardiovascular disease, HIV-related disease, and suicide.[15]
A 2023 cohort study in England found that transgender and gender-diverse individuals “had elevated overall mortality compared with cisgender people, specifically deaths from external causes (suicides, homicides, and accidental poisonings), endocrine disorders, and other ill-defined and unspecified causes.”[16]
A 2023 Danish study suggested that transgender individuals showed significantly elevated rates of suicide attempts, suicide deaths, non-suicide-related deaths, and overall mortality when compared to non-trans-identifying individuals.[17]
A 2011 Swedish cohort study found that individuals “after sex reassignment, have considerably higher risks for mortality, suicidal behavior, and psychiatric morbidity than the general population.”[18]
Another study from 2011 found a 51% increase in mortality for hormone-treated trans-identifying males. The increase in mortality was primarily attributed to non-hormone-related causes but may be associated with an increase in risk for cardiovascular death from ethinyl estradiol.[19]
A 2019 analysis of health records concluded that trans-identifying patients had significantly higher rates of MDD, Dysthymia, Bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, PTSD, OCD, schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder, adjustment disorder, dissociative disorder, somatoform disorder, personality disorder, ADHD, PDD, and autism when compared to the general population of 53,449,400 patients. They also had increased rates of inimical chemical dependencies, including alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, opioids, amphetamines, and tobacco.[20] Some of these factors likely contribute to the higher rates of morbidity and mortality among trans-identifying individuals.”
You won’t read about it on Wikipedia now. Why? Because this information was deleted by the editor, who (as follows from the history of his page) was blocked on Wikipedia in 2018 for “sockpuppetry” (conducting multiaccounts in order to push his point of view). I don’t know (but I can guess) how this LGBT Wiki activist regained right to edit articles again (because he is an LGBT Wiki activist obviously), but the fact remains that such figures often determine what information you get from this leftist-leaning LGBTQHIV+++ Wikipedia. So unless you have a lot of trust in authors like gay John Corvino, transgender Katie Herzog and others of their kind and editors who are full-time LGBT cultists, it’s unlikely that you should rely on Wikipedia to educate yourself on this topics, yeah.
Truth
See, Nohomo? This is what research looks like.
Not that he’ll listen since he’s in it for…well, I don’t know what he’s in it for, but it’s not for the truth. So thank you for that.
Anonymous
Did you get HIV yet?
Truth
No, I’ve been avoiding you, Nohomo.
Did you get therapy yet?